Don’t know! But I liked [Maggi Dawn's view](http://maggidawn.typepad.com/maggidawn/2007/10/writers-readers.html) on the relationship between writers, readers, conversations and blogs. She reported:
> I’ve read a bit lately that some Emerging Church bloggers (especially of the persuasion) have become disillusioned with blogging on the basis that it is not truly conversational. I am kind of surprised to read this in a way, because I never thought it was. Did you, honestly?

and then concluded that
> If you’re a blogger because you are a writer, you’ll write anyway.

I wouldn’t have said I was a writer, but I think this blog will be more about my need for expression than my need to be read. But we’ll see!

Tags:

This post has 1 comment.

  1. jgc
    06 Oct 07
    11:34 pm

    I’ve now read the comments on her post, and some were useful too. Particularly Andrew saying:

    And I very rarely get comments on my blog. But I get quite a few emails that mention something I have posted there; and conversations on the phone; and - and I’m still always suprised by this - lots of face-to-face conversations as a result of things I blog.

    and tlr’s comment:

    A blog works a bit like a digital scrapbook doesn’t it? A bit like having another sort of notebook, only tidier (slightly)and a bit more thought out (occasionally) but just as random (definitely).

    Which is bang on. And inspired me to re-christen this blog. Along with obligatory random colons. How could I re:frain?!